Are People Worth More than Plants?

Are human beings exceptional? Is there something about humans which makes them intrinsically superior to dogs or ants or even poisonous stinkweed?

If you saw my post yesterday, then you will already know the answer is, “Yes!”  Human beings are intrinsically of greater value than weeds and wildlife. Jesus once told His Human exceptionalism Image of Godfollowers, “Do not be afraid, you are worth more than many sparrows” (Matthew 10:31).  The Bible is plain that human beings alone are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27; 9:6).

Having jettisoned the Bible and the God of whom that book speaks, many people now are not sure that humans excel plants and animals.  Just the other day, a friend told me of an incident concerning his dog. A colleague at work insisted that the dog was a part of his family. My friend held firm to the categories he uses to classify animals: Pets, Predators, and Food.  Never do animals attain the status of persons in his classic taxonomy.

Another friend of mine from back in the swampland moved to Colorado for his job, which happens to be surveying land. I asked him what the difference was between surveying in Colorado as opposed to surveying in Louisiana. His response was simple: In Louisiana, you must plan about two hours of machete work chopping away still unclassified weeds before beginning the survey work. In Colorado, not only can you not machete any living thing—including weeds, but you must also be extra careful not to damage anything growing on the land.

Now, don’t take the concept of human exceptionalism to mean that you can run roughshod over everything on the earth that isn’t human. That is not the point. The point is simply to affirm the undeniable reality that taking a machete to stinkweed is not a crime, while taking a machete to a child is heinous murder.

I am sure there are some who think this point is too simplistic and represents a straw man argument. After all, no one believes that weeds are equal to humans, right? Wrong.  Increasingly, countries like Bolivia and Ecuador, along with cities like Pittsburgh, Santa Monica, and, now, Yellow Springs, Ohio, are passing ordinances to recognize the “rights” of plants and animals.

Wesley J. Smith—a man who has done more than nearly anyone to uphold the intrinsic value of human beings—has detailed the Yellow Springs city ordinance calling for equal “rights” for nature.  As Smith points out, more than 20 cities in the U.S. have adopted similar ordinances, giving the equivalent of human rights to plants.

The aim of those passing such laws is to elevate the value of nature, but the arrow they shoot is off the mark. The result of their efforts is not to elevate nature but to denigrate humankind. Here’s a part of the Yellow Springs ordinance:

In addition, the ordinance recognizes the legally enforceable Rights of Nature to exist and flourish. Residents of the village shall possess legal standing to enforce those rights on behalf of natural communities and ecosystems.

Isn’t it interesting that it requires human beings to uphold the rights that are supposed to belong to the plants?

A Bug’s Life

A bug’s life is now discriminatory.  Apparently, we should rename the movie and re-tool our thinking about bugs.  They aren’t to be thought of as bugs, but beasts.  So, we should think of a beast’s life, instead of a bug’s life.  Does this sound absurd?  Good!  It means there are still human beings left on the planet.

However, if the educational elites in Britain have their way, the future of the human race will diminish into a unitary “beasthood.”  As crazy as it sounds, educators in the UK are advocating tolerance toward insects.  A new school curriculum across the sea instructs children to stop the bug squashing and start respecting ants and roaches with the respect they supposedly deserve.  According the the curriculum, bugs deserve to be classified as “beasts.”  And, apparently, beasts shouldn’t be swatted or stomped.

As this blog post recognizes, these silly reclassifications serve only to diminish humanity.

Scooby-Do Deductions

Wesley J. Smith at First Things has a great post concerning proposed legislation to offer tax deductions for your pets and for the expense of pet ownership.  Ostensibly, the reasoning behind the bill is to help pet owners afford their pets during a down economy, thereby not abandoning them (and thus causing further expense for animal shelters, etc).  Smith rightly frames the issue as one of human exceptionalism, and he rightly calls for a clear line to be maintained between children and pets.  Offering the same deductions for your pets as for your children inevitably sends the wrong message–that the dog really is a member of the family in the same sense as the child.  Only human beings are created in the image of God.  And families are comprised of parents and children.

Kudos for the Kids

The story linked here is just crazy.  The kids are the ones in the story who make the most sense.  They were in a program which allowed them to learn all aspects of farm life.  Apparently, they caught on too well.  When they realized that some basic bartering could net them a few pigs, they decided to slaughter the lamb.  Now, it seems, all of England is up in arms over the little lamb.  The kids have it all figured out.  Maybe they will be able to help the adults learn a lesson.  This is one time it would be better for the kids to win the battle of the lamb.