Brooke Parks at Persecutionblog asks an excellent question: Is Christian Persecution a Social Justice Issue? I believe that it is. At least, I believe that persecution is a justice issue. Parks is correct to note the limits of social justice. Parks points out that the goal of ministry to the persecuted is not to remove inequality. The goal is not simply to make the persecution go away. The goal, according to Parks, is “for the church to be the body of Christ to them and with them.” I completely agree. From the New Testament perspective, “Being the body of Christ to them and with them” is primarily an action of justice. Caring for the persecuted is a fundamental expression of biblical justice. Perhaps the term “social” can be abandoned, but the idea of justice cannot. And here is why.
In the Old Testament, God Himself proved to be the one who would always “execute justice” and “love” the strangers and aliens among Israel (Deuteronomy 10). The revelation of God as the source of justice and love was supposed to govern Israel. Israel was expected to be like God, executing justice in her own midst, making sure that the poor, the orphans, the widows, and the powerless were not forgotten. In addition, Israel was supposed to show love to those who came into her midst from the nations around. In this way, Israel, like God, was supposed to model justice and love.
When the time came for Israel to adopt a king, the Lord gave specific instructions for the king: (1) That the king should first read, study, meditate upon, and obey carefully God’s law (Deut 17:18-20); (2) Then, second, that the king would execute justice and righteousness. This function of the king was on splendid display when the Queen of Sheba came to call upon Solomon. She proclaimed,
because the LORD loved Israel forever, therefore He made you king, to do justice and righteousness.” (1 Kings 10:9)
According to God, the king’s task was first to be just and, next, to execute laws of justice and righteousness for all of Israel.
When Christ came to establish His kingdom, He did so in righteousness. Christ was, of course, just. As He announced to John the Baptist, Christ also fulfilled all righteousness (Matthew 3:15). Christ would later explain that basic discipleship—that is, a basic knowledge of what it means to follow Him—includes learning to be obedient to all His commands (Matthew 28:18-20, commonly called the Great Commission). Being obedient to Christ’s commands is essentially putting God’s justice and righteousness into action.
Christ came as a righteous king to establish God’s righteous kingdom. Consequently, Christ taught His followers that they must pursue righteousness and the kingdom as matters of first importance (Matthew 6:33). Christ also taught His followers that their pursuit of justice/righteousness would lead them to be persecuted (see Matthew 5:10-12).
What all of this means is that to live the Christian life is to display God’s justice. Such a display will provoke persecution now just as it did when Christ and the Apostles ministered on earth. When Christ’s followers suffer persecution, they do so on account of righteousness (justice). They suffer for doing what is right in His name. It is His authority and His presence in His people which provokes the persecution.
So, in the New Testament, the first priority for social justice—that is, for feeding the poor, caring for widows, providing for orphans, and showing mercy to prisoners—is to minister to the persecuted and oppressed church. To use a common metaphor applied to the people of God in the New Testament, the first priority is to care for one’s own family—the family of God.
The idea of family first is evident in Paul’s instructions to Timothy regarding the care of widows:
But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
Christians are to do good to all people, but, especially, we are to do good to those who are of the household of faith, according to the Apostle Paul (Galatians 6:10). Not surprisingly, the New Testament is replete with examples of Christians doing good for fellow saints who are suffering.
Most references in the New Testament concerning feeding the poor actually understand the poor to be persecuted and suffering Christians. The offering Paul took from the churches was collected to care for needy, suffering saints in Jerusalem (see 1 Cor 16:1-4, Rom. 15:25). Paul Himself was partly responsible for the persecution which put these saints in such a needy state (see Acts 9:1-13). Little wonder, then, that after his conversion he felt responsible for their care.
When Paul went before Peter, James, and John to validate his commission to preach to the Gentiles, they gave him the right hand of fellowship and encouraged him to continue caring for the poor believers as he had been doing in Jerusalem (see Galatians 2:1-10). Likewise, the admonitions in the book of James concerning the poor also are references to the brother or sister among you, that is, to the poor and needy Christians.
Further, the care of widows and orphans—which is called by James a “pure and undefiled religion”—is care for widows and orphans in the household of faith. These issues—typically called issues of social justice—are primarily issues of Christians acting rightly toward fellow brothers and sisters of the faith. They are issues of justice within the household of faith.
When the New Testament speaks of visiting prisoners, it means that Christians are responsible to remember (Hebrews 13:3) and care for fellow Christians who have been thrown into prison on account of Christ (cf. Hebrews 10:34). In fact, Peter made sure the early church held to an important distinction in categorizing imprisonment:
Make sure that none of you suffers as a murderer, or thief, or evildoer, or a troublesome meddler; but if anyone suffers as a Christian, he is not to be ashamed, but is to glorify God in this name (1 Peter 4:15-16; cf. 1 Peter 3:17).
In the New Testament, issues of justice begin with the household of faith. As the household of faith learns to love one another rightly and, thus, executes the justice of God rightly so that God’s righteousness is on display, the world begins to see what justice and love actually are like. The whole world begins to know that Jesus Christ is present because of the way the Church loves one another (John 13:35). In this way, the Church witnesses to the world of Christ’s love.
So, it is important that the church exercises “justice” in caring for the poor and suffering Christians. In this way, ministry to the persecuted is the first order of “social justice” business. Our love for one another is crucial to our witness before the watching world.
Brooke Parks’ question has to be answered affirmatively: “Yes!” Persecution ministry is the foremost and primary act of social justice. Parks answered the question negatively, but only with regard to the non-biblical idea that justice concerns equality. Parks is correct to say that the goal of persecution ministry is not to bring society back into some arbitrary notion of balance or equity. Rather, the goal of persecution ministry is to display the righteousness of God in the face of world’s unrighteous desire to be rid of Christ by executing His people.
 For fuller discussion, see Thomas Schreiner, Galatians, in the Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, published by Zondervan.
No every Reformed is a Trickle-down economics Laissez-Faire Cowboy Capitalist Reaganite that believes social justice is a codeword for communism?.
No every Reformed, by example James White and Todd Friel, hates MLK’s and Mandela’s days
stand strongly oposite to adoption by USA congregations from Belhar Declaration of Faith against Apartheid-by example every participànt in Gospel Coalition-
or teaches Segregation, Apartheid and Colonialism are just fine or even mandated by God in Holy Bible
-by example Peter Hammond, Heiko Bocher, Dorothea Scarborough, Adi Schlebusch and Afrikaner Protestant Church with missionaries in England, Wales, Namibia, Canada, etc. – or even thinks Slavery is good and God’s given-by example Robert Dabney and Douglas Wilson-.
Your posts bashing social justice and green concerns as a concept; while using that same social justice you atacks, in order to label religious persecution as an issue from social justice; just remember that very absurd argument used by Reformed Pastors:
Evolution Theory is evil because created racism, but racism by whites in USA during segregation was good and George Wallace was a great Christian and profoundly racist Jerry Falwell was a great Southern Baptist Pastor.
Women`s rights are wrong, but pro-life is an issue from women`s rights and female empowerment.
Christians must to be separated from secular culture and concerns- every sermon by Paul Washer just says that-, but somebody just criticizing foreign and defense policy from USA is an Antichrist that must to be rebuked by pulpits.
As in that old days, when people just claiming Usa must to give back that robbed Canal to their only legitimate owners, the people of Panama; or people just oposite to USA support to Latin American dictators and Apartheid was very rudely condemnated by Churches in USA.
Yes, persecution from Christians is a priority, but to denounce political manipulation from using persecution as an excuse to bless USA criminal invasions from countries in order to take hold from their resources; and to expose gross atrocities by USA corporations and republican politicians are priorities also.
List from great persecutors from Christians, includes to Saudi Arabia, Israel and China; countries that just exists by money that get from dirty business deals with capitalists in USA.
USA capitalism funds persecutors, and pretend to be just seen as a global liberator.
No offences intended in my comments.
My comments are no a personal attack against you, I respect greatly to Pastors, and I`m a believer in Christ, and in Predestination also.
But I’m a near old man and I have grown very disgusted with permanent use by Republican Party in USA and National Party in SouthAfrica from Gospel, in order to justifying their cruel policies.
And from complicity from many Reformed theologians with that.