Value and Viability


Scientists have become rather free in their attempts to do something novel with embryonic stem cells.  I am linking an article here from Dr. Jones (not the movie guy; in fact, not a guy at all), where she argues for prudence in the practice of parthenogenesis.  The article is a bit technical, but it is helpful since she makes the argument that trying to define humanity along the lines of “viability” is dangerous.  If there is a point at which a human entity is considered “not a human being,” then, at that point, we might still be able to destroy it or experiment with it for purposes we think are good.  She points out in this article that taking such an approach would lead to more killings of babies considered genetically imperfect.  Why not experiment on the sick and elderly once they are no longer viable on their own?

One of the fascinating realities of our post-abortion mindset is that we will defend the protection of an eaglet (not a viable entity on its own) but refuse even to acknowledge the human nature of a human being in development.  I have linked a story here to give you an idea of just how highly we value eaglets (non-viable on their own) and eagles’ nests.  If only we valued developing humans and the womb as much!  For a philosophical consideration of the issue of viability, see this article.

One thought on “Value and Viability

  1. Pingback: Does the Bible Condemn Abortion? | Gregory C. Cochran

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s