According to this article, Pastor Jones is still planning to burn the bible of Islam at a service commemorating the 9th Anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks.
I have a couple of simple observations.
Pastor Jones has a right to burn the Quran. He lives in a nation which prides itself on freedom of speech. Clearly, he has the right under free speech laws to do what he is doing.
We should be glad that we are free to express ourselves in this way. To the extent that we are outraged at Pastor Jones, we are probably displaying either a fear of retaliation or an ingrained liberal bias. Free speech is not about allowing only the speech we like. It is about allowing precisely the speech we don’t like. Telling Mr. Jones he cannot do this would violate his freedom to express his religious and political views. Even repugnant views are expressible under our free speech laws.
Many who are outraged that he would burn the Quran are not likewise bothered by the many folks who burn Bibles and desecrate Jesus, Bibles, flags, effigies, etc. So, why the intense concern over the burning of a Quran? My guess is that the concern is a tacit acknowledgement that we are afraid that Muslims will become angry. Therefore, we think it best not to outrage them. Is this not itself an admission that Pastor Jones is on to something?
He claims that we have for too long placated the violent Islamists. Instead, he says we should assert our freedom and warn the Islamists not to become violent in retaliation. I can just imagine someone reading this and thinking Pastor Jones is just plain crazy. I might be easily convinced of that conclusion myself. Nevertheless, Jones is pointing to a double standard we have grown comfortable with embracing—the double standard of excusing violence in the name of Islam.
Think of it this way. If a group in San Francisco held a Bible-burning bonfire of the vanities to voice their displeasure with Christian opposition to gay marriage, few people would notice or care enough to protest the profligate pyro-technicians. Certainly, there would not be riots in Jakarta or Paris or London or New York. And if there were rioting in New York which ended with innocent bystanders being killed, we would go to the rioters and hold them accountable. We would not go to the Bible-burners in San Francisco and act as though they were responsible for causing the deaths.
We do have a double standard. I think the double standard is evidence that we secretly believe what Pastor Jones is saying, even though we dare not say it ourselves. We believe that a vocal majority of Muslims are violent against anyone who disagrees with their religion. If violence in Jakarta ensues, we will be even further persuaded, albeit also appalled by Pastor Jones. We may wish to condemn his actions, but we will still take notice of the violence in the name of Islam. At the end of the day, this is Islam’s problem: Violent backlashes tend to characterize Islam in the world today (whether the offense is cartoons, Papal speeches in Germany, or Qurans burning in Florida).
I don’t want to give the wrong impression here. I don’t think Pastor Jones is doing the right thing. As a pastor, I believe that we are to speak always with grace, seasoned as it were with salt. The salt of our seasoning is the gospel of grace through Christ. We are not called to salt the earth with incendiary rhetoric. Rather than extending a flaming torch, we should offer a rugged cross. But I do think a message is being revealed through the reactions of others.