Ian Bayne, a GOP candidate running for election in Illinois’s 11th District, sent an email to his supporters recently claiming that Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson is taking a stand against religious persecution in the same way that Rosa Parks took a seat against racial persecution in December of 1955. I have been trying to decide whether I believe Phil Robertson is suffering persecution on account of his identity in Christ.
I must admit that though I am a Christian, I am not much of a fan of Duck Dynasty. I live in California now, but Louisiana is my home state. My mother, in fact, lives in the same city which the Robertsons call home. Yet, I have tried to watch Duck Dynasty, and I just don’t enjoy it. Swamp People—I love that show! I identify with those folks. They remind me of my friends and relatives. They represent a little bit of the life I lived growing up in Louisiana. I do not as easily identify with the Robertsons.
But that doesn’t really matter because the issue is not whether I like or dislike the Robertsons. The question is whether or not Phil is suffering on account of the righteousness of Christ. If he is, then I owe him my prayers, support, and honor on account of Christ. If not, well, then I owe him nothing and will simply be able to explain to folks why his case is not Christian persecution.
Before being able to answer the question, I think we must first be able to define persecution. I wrote recently about the need for definitions when it comes to important biblical concepts like persecution. Phil Robertson’s case reaffirms why it’s so important for Christians to understand persecution. Phil’s case, I fear, is only the beginning.
I work from a definition of persecution derived from Jesus’s teaching in Matthew’s gospel. From Matthew 5, I conclude:
Persecution is a retaliatory action against the revelation of the righteousness of God in Christ which is represented or proclaimed by the followers of Jesus Christ.
Christ promises always to be present with His people. Christ’s people, from the beginning of our faith, learn the goodness of obeying Jesus. By our obedient actions and, further, by our speaking of Christ and His works, we Christians become targets for persecution. As we obey and proclaim, we necessarily display the righteousness of Christ. Many people today will be every bit as hostile against Christ and His teaching as they were against the first followers of our Lord 2,000 years ago.
Just as the world hated, mocked, and abandoned Jesus then, so, now, people will hate, mock, and forsake Jesus (and His followers).
The question, then, in Phil Robertson’s case is simply this: Is his suffering related to the righteousness of Christ? Is his suffering on account of Christ?
On the one hand, some of Phil’s statements were crude and definitely not representative of Christ. Christians are taught to avoid coarse talk (Eph 5:4). Phil’s language—by admission of his own family in their public statement—was a bit raw. Christians can’t be offensive and then claim, when called out for their offense, that they are suffering persecution. Persecution can only be a blessing if it occurs on account of Christ (and His righteousness). The Apostle Peter instructed Christians to make sure their suffering happens on account of doing what is right, not suffering for doing wrong (1 Peter 3:17). Phil could be suffering the consequences of wrong or foolish behavior.
And yet, as Denny Burk pointed out, the network was not offended by the language Roberston used. Clearly, A & E was offended by Robertson’s “personal beliefs.” Most assuredly, the personal beliefs in question were those related to the sinfulness of homosexuality. Robertson—however crudely—spoke the truth from the Scriptures. He rightly affirmed from the Scriptures his belief that homosexuality is a sin. More than merely personal beliefs, Robertson’s statement reflects biblical truth. The truth which Robertson believes now has him off the air. He is suffering the loss of a television show on account of biblical truth, and that kind of suffering, in my opinion, is Christian persecution.
As always, others are free to disagree and offer their own reasons for their disagreement. But I think I side with Ian Bayne. Phil Robertson is suffering persecution.
it was a no brainer. The terrorist called GLAAD attacked him for being Christain. When they were attacked they quickly pulled the race card. I failed to see that. I was not around Jim crow or that time. I am sure some slaves accepted their situation as tribal and many others were mistreated. Terrorist do not have to blow things up. All they have to do is disrupt normal daily life. I am told to accept some one regardless of their conduct. If not I am guilty of a hate crime. I truly think. We are being held hostage by 3% of the voters by illegal registration and shifting of districts to gain control. I fail to see why electing women to office of putting them in charge of companies, some how makes us smarter or more sophisticated. That being said Martha Lane Collins was the best Ky govonor in my time. How ever she or her administration had a plan or vision. Social issues will not rebuild this country.
Wow! You covered a lot of ground there, brother. Stay fixed on Christ. Have a merry Christmas.
Sent from my iPhone
Thanks, my head is a rock. That is why I need church and good Christian brothers to keep me on the path to grow closer to God
Don’t we all? God bless. Have a great Christmas.